US President-elect Donald Trump has named Pete Hegseth, a Fox News commentator, author, and military veteran, as his choice for Defence Secretary. This announcement was made alongside the appointment of billionaire Elon Musk to a government cost-cutting role ‘DOGE’.
Hegseth, an Ivy League graduate born in Minneapolis, Minnesota, has carved out a public persona as a staunch conservative voice. He served as a major in the Minnesota National Guard, with deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo Bay. After leaving the military in 2021, citing disillusionment with its leadership, Hegseth became a prominent right-wing commentator, outspoken on military and cultural issues. Living in Tennessee with his wife and seven children, Hegseth has been critical of what he describes as “woke” policies in the US military and society at large.
His lack of significant management experience and controversial statements have raised concerns among Pentagon officials and military observers. If confirmed, Hegseth will oversee 1.3 million active-duty personnel and nearly a million civilian staff.
What Does Hegseth Preach?
Hegseth’s ideology is grounded in a staunch opposition to progressive policies, particularly within the military. He has criticised diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, referring to them as detrimental to the core mission of warfighting. He has also opposed women in combat roles, expressing a desire to revert to military standards from the 1990s.
Hegseth’s criticism of military leadership has been pointed. He has accused senior figures, such as General Charles Brown Jr., of being promoted due to political correctness, citing race as a factor. He has also indicated a desire to purge the military of leaders and policies he perceives as overly progressive.
In his 2020 book, The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free, Hegseth lamented what he described as the sidelining of traditional military values and leaders. His rhetoric aligns closely with Trump’s campaign promises to overhaul military leadership, prioritising a return to what they perceive as traditional, combat-focused priorities.
His views extend beyond domestic military policy. Hegseth has shown support for Israel’s territorial ambitions, including the idea of expanding settlements and building a new Jewish temple on the site of Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa mosque, reflecting his alignment with Israel’s far-right.
What Does Hegseth Mean for NATO?
Hegseth’s appointment has potential implications for NATO. Historically, he has been sceptical of NATO’s effectiveness, criticising its allies for being militarily weak and overly reliant on the United States. While he has articulated few detailed policies, his alignment with Trump’s America First agenda suggests a prioritisation of unilateral military interests over multilateral commitments.
Under Trump’s first administration, tensions with NATO allies increased due to demands for higher defence spending and a perceived lack of commitment to collective defence. Hegseth’s scepticism of NATO, combined with his hawkish stance on China, could lead to a more confrontational approach, focusing on power projection rather than alliance-building.
The potential weakening of NATO solidarity may embolden adversaries like Russia and China, while also straining US-European relations. Hegseth’s rhetoric and priorities signal a possible pivot towards a more transactional relationship within the alliance, furthering Trump’s vision of NATO as an organisation where allies must “pay their way.”
What Might This Mean for the UK?
For the UK, Hegseth’s appointment poses both challenges and opportunities. As a key NATO ally, the UK has traditionally aligned itself closely with US defence policy. However, the transactional approach Hegseth seems to advocate may pressure Britain to further increase its defence spending or take on a more prominent military role within NATO.
The UK’s recent investments in its armed forces and its leadership in European security—particularly in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—position it as a vital partner for the US. However, Hegseth’s scepticism towards multilateralism could strain the “special relationship” if the UK’s priorities diverge from Washington’s unilateral stance.
Conversely, Hegseth’s hardline approach to China could align with Britain’s increasing focus on Indo-Pacific security. This shared interest might open avenues for deeper bilateral cooperation, particularly in countering Beijing’s growing influence. Yet, any perceived erosion of NATO’s collective strength would likely complicate UK efforts to maintain a unified Western defence posture.
Final Thought
Pete Hegseth’s nomination as Defence Secretary reflects Donald Trump’s broader agenda of upending traditional norms in both domestic and foreign policy. Hegseth’s lack of experience, coupled with his divisive rhetoric, has already sparked debate in the US and among its allies. For NATO, his leadership could mean a shift towards a more confrontational and less collaborative dynamic, with potential ripple effects for global security.
For the UK, navigating this new chapter will require careful diplomacy and strategic foresight. Balancing its commitment to NATO with the evolving priorities of a Hegseth-led Pentagon will be a test of Britain’s role as a bridge between Europe and the United States. While there are opportunities for alignment, particularly on China, the UK must also prepare for potential obstacles.
For more of Curia’s analysis on US politics, please click here.