In a critical moment for animal welfare, Chamber UK interviewed Chris Luffingham, the acting Chief Executive of the League Against Cruel Sports, to discuss the ongoing battle against illegal fox hunting in the UK.
Despite the introduction of the Hunting Act in 2004, loopholes have allowed cruel hunting practices to persist under the guise of trail hunting. With renewed efforts to close these loopholes, Luffingham provides insight into the current situation, the impact on wildlife and rural communities, and the road ahead.
Understanding the Loopholes in the Fox Hunting Act
The 2004 Hunting Act was designed to put an end to cruel hunting practices, but according to Chris Luffingham, “there are nine significant loopholes that have allowed illegal fox hunting to continue.” These loopholes are exploited through the practice of trail hunting—a supposed sport where an artificial scent is followed. However, Luffingham describes this as “a smokescreen for illegal hunts,” explaining that “the police know and have been on record as saying that this is just nothing but a fiction. It’s a lie.”
The persistence of these loopholes reveals a significant challenge in enforcing the law as it stands. The loopholes have enabled hunters to continue their activities much as they did before the ban, effectively undermining the intent of the legislation. This situation highlights a critical need for legal reform, as the current laws are clearly insufficient to protect wildlife from cruelty.
Impact on Rural Communities and Wildlife
The consequences of these illegal hunts extend far beyond the immediate victims of the hunts themselves.
Luffingham highlighted the severe disruption caused in rural communities: “Every year we have incidents of hunts creating havoc within local communities—running across roads, railway lines. Hounds are killed frequently by passing traffic or trains themselves.” He recounted the tragic case of Millie the cat, who was savaged by a pack of hounds in Cornwall, stating, “These are not unusual circumstances. The impact on rural communities in particular is extraordinary.”
The ongoing disruption and law-breaking have left communities frustrated and calling for stronger enforcement of the ban. The fact that domestic animals are sometimes caught up in these hunts adds to the sense of injustice and urgency surrounding this issue.
Luffingham’s comments underscore the widespread impact of illegal hunting, which affects not just wildlife but also the safety and peace of local residents.
Labour Party’s Response and Commitments
The Labour Party has long been an advocate for stronger anti-hunting measures, and Luffingham expressed cautious optimism about their commitments. “The Labour Party have always been strong advocates of an anti-hunt movement,” he said. “They have committed to not just banning trail hunting but closing all of those loopholes and ending hunting once and for all.”
However, Luffingham was quick to point out that promises alone are not enough: “Talk is cheap—actions are what matter.” The Labour Party’s manifesto promises to ban trail hunting within the first term of a Labour government are encouraging, but the true test will be in their ability to deliver on these promises if elected. This underscores a broader issue in politics—how often campaign promises translate into tangible policy changes.
Leveraging Public Support for Legislative Change
Public sentiment is overwhelmingly in favour of strengthening fox hunting laws, with approximately 80-85% of people supporting anti-hunting measures.
Luffingham emphasised the importance of leveraging this public support to push for legislative changes. “Support for anti-fox hunting measures is the same whether you’re in a rural community or whether you live in an urban environment,” he noted. “What we have to do is continue what we’ve been doing for the last few years—pressurising, cajoling, encouraging, and supporting all efforts to change the law for the better.”
The broad public support for banning fox hunting presents a significant opportunity for advocacy groups to push for change. Luffingham’s strategy of working with private landowners, as demonstrated by the success with the National Trust, shows a multifaceted approach to achieving their goals. This strategy could serve as a model for other campaigns seeking to effect change through both grassroots efforts and political advocacy.
Final Thought
The fight to end illegal fox hunting in the UK is far from over. While there is hope on the horizon with political commitments and strong public support, the success of these efforts depends on continued pressure and decisive action. As Chris Luffingham and the League Against Cruel Sports intensify their campaign, the message is clear: it’s time to close the loopholes and end the cruelty for good.
The ongoing challenge will be holding politicians accountable to their promises and ensuring that legal reforms are not just passed but effectively enforced. With the public overwhelmingly behind the movement, there is a strong mandate for change—now it’s up to the government to act.
To watch the full interview, please subscribe to Chamber’s YouTube channel and click below.